not boolean. I"m not even sure you can call it "pseudo-boolean" without understanding is surrounding code. How do you know that $q can never be false?

bless {}, ref $class || $class; foo( $p || $q );

	Sent On	Yuval Kogman
Refine Search	org.perl.perl-qa
Date, Forward	11 Jul 2005 19:27
Jérôme Fenal	11 Jul 2005 14:54	...
Michael G Schwern (	12 Jul 2005 16:13
Shlomi Fish	11 Jul 2005 13:17
Date, Backward	leif...@hpa.com.au
@pobox.com	leif...@hpa.com.au
11 Jul 2005 19:50	12 Jul 2005 19:43
David Golden	11 Jul 2005 17:46
12 Jul 2005 07:11	11 Jul 2005 17:21
Paul Johnson	11 Jul 2005 16:43	\|
James E Keenan	14 Jul 2005 13:22	\|
Michael G Schwern	Michael G Schwern	FAQ
Michael G Schwern	11 Jul 2005 14:33
Yuval Kogman	11 Jul 2005 19:27
Our Blog	11 Jul 2005 09:27	)
11 Jul 2005 14:22	12 Jul 2005 08:52	...
Michael G Schwern	11 Jul 2005 13:56
Relevance	11 Jul 2005 14:53	\|
12 Jul 2005 02:48	Michael G Schwern
11 Jul 2005 15:02	Michael G Schwern	From
@pobox.com	Messages per Month	Home
Attachments	12 Jul 2005 00:45
David Golden	11 Jul 2005 09:38
11 Jul 2005 15:19	Michael G Schwern
Feedback	11 Jul 2005 11:50

Browse	That assumption only works in void context.
From:	12 Jul 2005 19:59 \| Paul Johnson
Sort by	special \|\|= case:
Subject:	11 Jul 2005 19:34

die. open FILE, $foo || die $!; about On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 05:33:26PM -0400, David Golden wrote:

Re: Devel::Cover Problem: testing || for about default value.

just a "$p || print $q" ).

Re: Devel::Cover Problem: testing || for a default value. - Michael G Schwern - org.perl.perl-qa - MarkMail the "my $foo = $p || $q"

26 messages in org.perl.perl-qa

$class being false would be quite the 0 || 0 case because you assume $class of differentiate that in most cases you want to ignore the true boolean context ( "foo() if $p || $q" a "pseudo-boolean" context that context between the error. Devel::Cover can"t know to always be some true value and don"t think its worth testing that it might be false. ( "my $foo = $p || $q" ) and a standalone statement ( My suggestion turns on the question of whether it"s possible to is really part or an assignment )

Perl well enough. The concept I had was that *EXCEPT* in true boolean context, the false-alarm. : Want.pm seems to include the "$p || $q" idiom is (I think) pretty much logically equivalent of this might be possible, but I don"t know that truth table in this situation only needs to imply to a trinary operation "$p ? $p the first operand, thus avoiding the $q" (ignoring potential side effects) and thus the guts

http://www.szgy.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=11304

# Don"t care of the return value

Mon 04:39:21 | cache-2.a | 0.18 seconds |

-- Michael G Schwern

Search for: